tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7523905577988256012.post4534390291036915794..comments2023-10-08T08:31:47.055-07:00Comments on Beat The Chip: PINK UNDERWEAR: Arpaio arrests 6 year old without legal IDBeat The Chiphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14039385802156627817noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7523905577988256012.post-45736847843503370162012-07-14T14:39:57.899-07:002012-07-14T14:39:57.899-07:00RE: James -- Why should our government pay for the...RE: James -- Why should our government pay for the education of any child - period. Government mandates the structures of what children are taught today. The bell systems still used in schools today are based on factory worker grooming (post industrial). Our society has changed so drastically that government sponsored education is embedded with top down philosophy, eugenics, discredits to critical thinking and a pipeline to jails. This is the "alma mater" practice- the parent away from home, or paternal Statism. The benefits any child receives and the quality of their education is based on their personal penchant for discipline, desire to learn and incentive to make progress in society. Immigration doesn't have a damn thing to do with it. A six year old child being is not illegal. The State functioning as a criminal, dehumanizing entity who reduces the life of that six year old to such a base caging squalor that her parents, forced to migrate to sustain a life outside of indigenous means -deprived of the benefit personal property and equitable commerce, tripped on the lines of US immigration. It is the government with a renown reputation for choosing the sledgehammer as a fly swatter. Whose fault is that? If you fell for the eugenics line you were force fed in your government education you will believe it is the child's fault for being a class or race inferior, unapproved of by the State. If you fell for the Statist line that you were taught in government sponsored school you may believe it is the government's role to parent and educate such a child (i.e. which government shall educated the six year old). I believe none of the above. I believe 6 year old children should be allowed to be 6 year olds. The State should have no business with them for being or doing 6 year old things - like travelling with their parents.Beat The Chiphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14039385802156627817noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7523905577988256012.post-77118787087854981812012-07-13T12:49:25.679-07:002012-07-13T12:49:25.679-07:00This is so sad, but it is something allowed by the...This is so sad, but it is something allowed by the government to have come to this place because of having allowed the parents to bring those children across the border or having the mother come across the border just in time to have a baby. If the people of this nation are to hear that our schools are failing because of overcrowding, then this will have to be a nessasary action to say for the hundredth thousand time, "Why should taxpayer American's have to pay for the education of an illegal child?"Jameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14359453518481180371noreply@blogger.com