BTC - I'm sure it's clear by now that this is not the blog that gives a fair and balanced perspective. We have a tough enough time getting our perspective represented in the media.
BeatTheChip delivers the Anti-Real ID perspective religiously. We aggregate content as soon as news develops. However like anything else in this world - in order to advance the cause and alter the course of history, we need money. At the bottom of every entry on these blogs is an opportunity to give. Friday is a conventional pay day. You can count on us to shove off Numbers USA and tell Janice Kephart to go to hell DAILY. [We know they read our blog too.]
Subscribing is free, but we are asking for an initial give of between $2 -$10 for BTC content, which features frontline interviews and information about privacy, identity, technology and national legislation from those who create the news.
Free-market banditos like Jim Harper understand. You gotta get paid to change the world and that's okay. Without further ado ... classic conservative analysis to PROBLEM>REACTION> SOLUTION with Jim Harper, who has a great book up for review, Identity Crisis: How Identity is Overused & Misunderstood, available for sale as well.
If the federal REAL ID revival bill (PASS ID) becomes law, it will give congressional approval to EDLs, which up to now have been simply a creation of the federal security and state driver licensing bureaucracies.
As governor of Arizona, the current Secretary of Homeland Security signed a memorandum of understanding with the DHS to implement EDLs, and she backs PASS ID even though she signed an anti-REAL ID bill as governor. As I said before, Secretary Napolitano seems to be taking the national ID tar baby in a loving embrace.
Here’s Michigan state representative Paul Opsommer (R) on the Department of Homeland Security’s “Enhanced Driver’s License,” which contains a radio frequency identification chip with a long read range:
Expect the Department of Homeland Security to tell you what a great thing they are doing by allowing you the ability to buy these RFID licenses. They create the problem, provide a solution that is the cheapest for them and most risky for you, and then expect you to like it. But RFID is not mandated by Congress, and if enough states stand up for themselves the policy will be changed. Michigan needs to say no and do just that.