Non-Driver IDs Issued in New Hampshire

USE OF NON DRIVER ID ISSUED AUTOMATICALLY
By KEVIN LANDRIGAN, Staff Writer
klandrigan@nashuatelegraph.com

CONCORD – State safety and motor vehicle officials admitted Monday they should have done more promotion prior to issuing the first temporary driver's licenses to New Hampshire residents earlier this month.

Restaurant and bar owners said they had no advance word before the June 1 start about the black-and-white, temporary documents patrons present to prove they are of legal drinking age.

Similar confusion has arisen at airports when travelers have to show the temporary license to board an airplane.

"It's hard to deny that, somehow, we could have done a better job," Assistant Safety Commissioner Earl Sweeney said during a press conference Monday.

State officials said they have met with leaders from federal aviation agencies and in the restaurant, hotel and banking industries to discuss the temporary license issue.

Still, Motor Vehicles Director Virginia Beecher recommended that state residents who received a temporary version of their new driver's license should carry other picture identification, such as an old license or a passport until they get the permanent license.

The temporary licenses are made of tear-resistant paper and are being given to all motorists. Officials say they will allow law enforcement to detect as many as 100,000 who illegally possess New Hampshire licenses but live in some other state or country.

Permanent licenses will be mailed to New Hampshire drivers in three to four weeks after they get a temporary one, Safety Commissioner John Barthlemes said.

Meanwhile, Beecher and Barthelmes announced that by early September car and truck owners will all start receiving a new annual motor vehicle registration with enhanced security features.

The new form contains a bar code with verifying information about the vehicle owner. By the end of summer, the statewide database of registration will be accessible online to staff in all city and town clerk offices, to all State Police troopers and local police departments that have laptop computers with the right scanning equipment.

Most states already have the bar code security on their own vehicle registrations, Barthlemes said.

"This has become the new wave of the 21st Century," Barthelmes said.

Both the license and new registration contain many more security features to aid law enforcement and reduce identity theft, Beecher added.

While the old driver's license had one security feature – a Division of Motor Vehicles numbered seal – the new, permanent license will have five.

The temporary license is more secure than the old one with the image of the driver's photo appearing in two places, Beecher said.

Only 13 cities and towns in the state, including Manchester and Nashua, fail to have online access to the motor vehicle registration information.

Assistant Safety Commissioner Sweeney said registration info is mailed to the state DMV, and staffers there have to manually enter the data into their own database.

This can delay state officials getting up to date registry information from a small town for as much as a few weeks, Sweeney added.

Getting all communities online is the first step to one day letting citizens register their cars or trucks online and only have to go in person every 10 years to update a driver's license.

"I'm not going to give you a timeline, but I hope sooner rather than later. It's a priority," Barthelmes added.

ANSWERS: HR 2593 - The Borderlands Conservation and Security Act of 2007

Long before I knew of the problems of Real ID, Raul Grijalva had written and collected co-sponsors of a bill to repeal Section 102C of the Real ID Act.  The Real ID Act has created insane-making amounts of misery for border residents trying to live their lives peacibly at the Texas-Mexico border.

Grijalva's bill HR 2593 a.k.a. as The Borderlands Conservation and Security Act is a political work of diplomatic art.  As my political education continues,  I see the moderation and sobriety in this bill which seeks to achieve what so many have failed at: an agreed direction on border securities and controlling illegal immigration.   Regulating the US-Mexican border is a nearly impossible issue; being able to please anyone regarding the work is naive.  The word "challenging" is an understated description of the pitfall laden political traps set for ANYONE attempting to decide on this issue.  May the compassion of the heavens be with the Rep. Grijalva and his 49 co-sponsors with a set face to repeal the Real ID Act, Section 102C.

We here at BeatTheChip.org salute you.  It takes brave people to stand up to DHS and the Bush junta.  It's tough to negotiate with dictators.  We stand with you.

More about Rep. Grijalva's bill here.

36 Federal Laws Waived by DHS

In April the Department of Homeland Security waived the following federal laws to expedite construction of a 30 foot border wall fence to the US and Mexico. The Real ID Act gives discretionary authority to Secretary Chertoff  to waive the following acts.

The National Environmental Policy Act

The Endangered Species Act

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act)

The National Historic Preservation Act

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act

The Clean Air Act

The Archelogical Resources Protection Act

The Safe Drinking Water Act

The Noise Control Act

The Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Acr

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

The Archaelogical and Historic Preservation Act

The Antiquities Act

The Historic Sites, Buildings, and Antiquities Act

The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act

The Farmland Protection Policy Act

The Coastal Zone Management Act

The Wilderness Act

The Federal Land Policy and Management Act

The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act

The Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956

The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act

The Adminsitrative Procedure Act

The Otay Mountain Wilderness Act of 1999 Sections 102 (29) 

Section 103, Title I of the California Desert Protection Act

The National Park Service Organic Act

The National Park Service General Authorities Act

Sections 401(7), 403, and 404 of the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978

Sections 301(a)-(f) of the Arizona Desert Wilderness Act, The Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899

The Eagle Protection Act 

The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act

The American Indian Religious Freedom Act

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act

The National Forest Management Act of 1976

The Multiple Use and Sustained Yield Act of 1960

Views from DHS Insiders ; 5-11 Campaign Press

Do you see the hidden irony in Jim Toroks artwork? 

*L -I-A-R

Does this sentiment look familiar?  DHS is telling you "Things are okay."  

READERS: What are your thoughts? Please comment on the corresponding forums:

Homeland Security is notorious for adding a "for your security" claus right before they strip you of some element of freedom.  Usually these are freedoms you actually need to go about your natural way of life as an American.  The corresponding sentiments from DHS ring to the tune of, "Things will be more secure - more okay- if we do it this way."

Bad news kids : 48 states went for the Federal Grants for Real IDs.   Part of the conditions for accepting federal monies is that the States are in full submission to the Real ID implementation policies. They accepted the "okay-ness" of Real IDs for your state.  Again - this happened while you were going on with your life.  We have a high maintenance government who is behaving badly.

You can ask your state to reject the federal funding for Real Ids.

Jim Harper, a DHS insider explains his point of view:

"Were there ever any doubt that Real ID was a national {now confirmed International} identity system and a step toward cradle-to-grave, government- mandated biometric tracking, Family Security Matters has helped clear that up."

The blogging friends of the DHS deliver a positive report on the "effectiveness" of carding flyers at airports (6/23):

"We're 48 hours into the new procedure and things have been smooth so far.  Approximately 650 people have shown up to security checkpoints without ID and a total of 20 people have not been allowed to fly. That is .0005 percent of the approximately four million people that flew this weekend. "

Way to go? I'm curious about the 20 people who didn't get to fly.  Were they bad people or did they just insist on invoking their civil rights on not having to show their papers to fly. For those who visit the link here you will see some of the responses people left.  Among the gems (typically from Anonymous posters) :

"If they get a pat-down and bag check, who cares if they're on their way?  This is the point you continually ignore as you lie to us about the "supposed" security this nonsensical policy change provides.  In fact, you know as well as we do that this new policy does nothing more to make anyone safer, and by diverting resources from things that WOULD make us safer, like screening cargo, actively makes us less safe."

Missouri:  A reluctant target for Real ID implementation  

Missouri is the first stop for the Real ID electronic network in America.   Missouri is not so enthusiastic about the $17 million  development of AAMVA's Real ID hub,  but they still get to wear the"guinea pig"name tag for this development.  Whoopee. Yay.

Missouri Rep. Jim Guest, head of Legislators Against Real IDs,  will be speaking on Derry Brownfield's show, July 3rd - 10:00 AM (CST) about what an electronic hub in Missouri means for the rest of the US .  You can catch the show online at GCNlive.com  

DHS also passed out $1.2 million in government cheese to states Florida, Indiana, Nevada, and Wisconsin willing to road test Real ID's.  Nevada and Wisconsin fought against allowing state funding for the implementation of Real IDs.  Florida and Indiana have not filed any resistance whatsoever in the development for Real ID's.   

Other "5-11"end states are Washington and North Carolina.

What does it mean to be "5-11"ened?  Please check out Carol Broulliet's radio program, Questioning War, Organizing Resistance - Hour 1: Katherine Albrecht &  Jim Guest ,  Hour 2 : 5-11 Campaign speaks  

DEAF TO A HEARING

US Supreme Court Shuts Out Environmental Contingency

"We will not sit idly by while our property is seized by the federal government to build an expedient but useless, expensive and potentially damaging wall across the Texas-Mexico border," said coalition president Chad Foster, mayor of Eagle Pass.  "We are determined to stop Secretary Chertoff from acting as if he is above the law."

Texas, USA - Apparently Supreme Court justices are both deaf and blind in the Constitutional review of facts surrounding the border fences in Texas and DHS waivers tied to The Real ID Act of 2005.

AP reports here:

McALLEN, Texas (AP)-- A U.S. Supreme Court decision paving the way for a 670-mile fence along the U.S. - Mexico border drew swift criticism from environmentalists, who promised to make another legal stand in Texas.

The justices' turned down a plea Monday to hear a lawsuit opposing a two mile section of the fence in Arizona brought by the Sierra Club and Defenders of Wildlife.  

The section of the fence in question in that case has already been built and even if the court had taken the case, oral arguments would not have been heard until October.

But Monday's decision could have the most immediate implications for Texas, where opposition has been most widespread and fence construction is expected to begin next month.  :: FULL STORY HERE::

Please hear from the Sierra Club,  the Defenders of  Wildlife and 5-11 Campaign: Texans Against Real ID's  on KOOP's Shade's of Green Show with host Ken McKenzie,  July 3rd  @ 1 PM (CST) .

US Supreme Court Plays "Deaf "  :: FULL STORY HERE:: 

F MINUS: AAMVA Gets ID Hub Contract

THE NETWORK HAS A PARENT: AAMVA

c/o Homeland Stupidity Blog

The American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators received a no bid contract worth millions of dollars to implement a "verification hub" connecting state and federal databases under the Real ID program.

AAMVA, which already maintains a database of commercial drivers in every state, was believed to be the company that would get the contract for the verification hub which, when completed, will allow states to electronically verify documents such as birth certificates and Social Security with other states and with the federal government.

The database begins with a $17 million REAL ID Demonstration Grant awarded to the state of Missouri, which will then pass on that cash to AAMVA to do the actual work of developing the system.  Four other states, Florida, Indiana, Nevada, and Wisconsin, received $1.2 million grants to be the first states to connect to the new database. ::FULL STORY HERE::

____________________

BTC Commentary:  AAMVA is now responsible for your SSN# and birth certificates should you surrender them to the DMV for "federal purposes".   You should know at this time you can request a NON FEDERAL ID if you are going in to renew your license.   We also happen to know that AAMVA is a self-professed "information clearinghouse".   Which means they will release the information they have to whomever is buying in BULK.    It's here - THIS is the network that is documented as insecure and prone to identity hacking.  Don't be stupid. Don't give your Social to AAMVA.

Digimarc Has Got Your Money

80 Million Tax dollars is on Digimarc

C/O Trading Markets.com

More than 58 million has been awarded to support state-specific programs to achieve Real ID material compliance, which involves updating state driver's license and ID card systems with extra security features.  Funding was also provided for the development and testing of the verification hub, which will enable all states to verify applicant proof-of-identity documents.

Digimarc provides products and services that enable the annual production of more than 60 million personal identification documents, including two-thirds of US driver's licenses and IDs for more than 25 countries.

____________

BTC Commentary - Comments? Anyone? Anyone? Post beneath this article.

80 million dollars..  I wonder if someone who loves freedom will just buy out Digimarc's contract, so DHS can go deal with some other issue that directly affects our national security.  That would be, opposed to creating a situation that has the potential to criminalize those without proper  federal IDs.   I know many of  the Free Market minded people have some kind of monetary excesses.  Maybe if we pony up like 120 million collectively and say "DIGIMARC- We'll pay you NOT to do business with DHS on Real IDs,"  - they may just lose interest in Real ID's.  I'm not sure what DHS will do if that happens.  You can call your State's head of Motor Vehicles to find out how much money will be paid from your state to induct you into the New World Order's cattle-log by simply asking for the amount of money going to Digimarc.  If they are not telling, get someone with a Law Degree to ask your question with an Open Records Request-  the paper sodium penenthol for bureaucrats. We have ways of getting the truth.

This is about money, just like every other aspected pursuit of American "happiness".     If we don't want Digimarc doing this - DHS will find some other way.  They will probably outsource the work to somewhere (US  Homeland Security ) for digital securities that require our social security numbers, address, your age,  your gender and other cute things like your hair color, your eye color and a neat 3d  profile of your face. 

No wonder everyone hates us.  Why are we so special?  The street kids in Mumbai don't get a cool 3D face profile.  What the hell is that about?  Some 15 year old constructing our surveillance chips in a clean room somewhere in Southeast Asia has an exam to prep for. Why the hell are we making his life difficult with Real IDs?  HAVE SOME COMPASSION!

The concern here is that Homeland Security  will cut corners here and behave like any other corporatized element of our government.  If it's a boring dirt job that can be done without paying an American a living wage, it will be shipped overseas and someone else will be doing it.  It may be too much to ask Homeland Security to do this themselves.   We do in fact know that the technologies used are being constructed and tested in fun places like Pakistan.   Which may eventually mean that your SSN# , address etc will be handled  by some other person in another country for Homeland Security.   In a rational mind, this defeats the purpose of calling it  "homeland security".  More research is needed on where the inventory of your identity records will land after DHS funnels it through the DMV.  If it's outside the borders of the US, what is the fundamental drive behind you having this national ID?   Ask now before you surrender the keys to your identity to the DMV.