This applies to mechanical snafus, hemmorrages, cancers, flesh infections, ruptures and digital test rigging, re-rigging, runs and re-runs on chip instillation and information readouts in ..animals. Namingly your pets. The closer "they" can get it to home, "they" will.
You wonder who sits around hatching this megalomaniacal deluded sci-fi garbage and the surreality of these situations - applied science to manage the human animal. It's the same generation after generation. It's a fistful of inbred white guys, their greed-drugged patsys and interlocuting sociopaths as constant company. Yes-Men with money. And now Yes-Women, like Nazi Pelosi, who has turned to routine thuggery instead of relying fairly on the people of San Francisco whom once trusted her.
Of course, I refer to the rash of violences sustained by vocal anti-war critic and campaign competitor Cindy Sheehan. Political competitors like Sheehan have been shut down, silenced and their speaking engagements cancelled for them by spine-free venue owners and promoters. One such festival was We The People Festival in which Sheehan, Cynthia McKinney, Jack Blood & a Los Angeles organic farmer were told that they were not to speak on City Grounds under threat of shutting down the entire event by Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. GOOGLE: We The People Festival.
It's obvious that they are creating an enemy from their intemperances whom they justly fear. Which is why they have to re-route their ends-to-a means and abuse technologies to do it. Why? Because they can.
Here is what you need to know and remember: technology relies on use and personal adoption to work. If you don't adopt the technology then it's not going to be a "tool of the establishement". So "they" really only have 2 options with microchipping :
A) Get you to "volunteer" for the technology adoption program
B) The shove-it-down-your-throat adoption program
The onus is on you in rejecting both programs if you don't need to adopt their technologies. The tech engineers they employ will go do something else with their ingenuity and "they" can afford to take a hit, especially for trying to compromise the American public against themselves.
OK...here's a great example from yet another-freaked-out-mother who discovers the evil future planned for who she cares for. You see the "voluntary" vs. "mandatory" elements of technology adoption here.
From Women-Not-Dabbling-In Normal - Read whole exerpt for Rep. Karen Johnson's Letter
[The]USDA has failed to follow any of the administrative procedures required to create enforceable regulations when it issued this new step in NAIS. So whether USDA can actually enforce it.
USDA has failed to follow any of the administrative procedures required to create enforceable regulations when it issued this new step in NAIS. So whether USDA can actually enforce it isn’t clear. On the other hand, USDA has created the entire NAIS program without regard to following the rules administrative agencies must follow, soit’s likely that the state agencies will automatically follow the USDA’s memo. Here are some excerpts from
USDA has failed to follow any of the administrative procedures required to create enforceable regulations when it issued this new step in NAIS. So whether USDA can actually enforce it isn’t clear. On the other hand, USDA has created the entire NAIS program without regard to following the rules administrative agencies must follow, so it’s likely that the state agencies will automatically follow the USDA’s memo. Here are some excerpts from the memo:
Here is what you need to know and remember: technology relies on use and personal adoption to work. If you don't adopt the technology then it's not going to be a "tool of the establishement". So "they" really only have 2 options with microchipping :
A) Get you to "volunteer" for the technology adoption program
B) The shove-it-down-your-throat adoption program
The onus is on you in rejecting both programs if you don't need to adopt their technologies. The tech engineers they employ will go do something else with their ingenuity and "they" can afford to take a hit, especially for trying to compromise the American public against themselves.
OK...here's a great example from yet another-freaked-out-mother who discovers the evil future planned for who she cares for. You see the "voluntary" vs. "mandatory" elements of technology adoption here.
From Women-Not-Dabbling-In Normal - Read whole exerpt for Rep. Karen Johnson's Letter
[The]USDA has failed to follow any of the administrative procedures required to create enforceable regulations when it issued this new step in NAIS. So whether USDA can actually enforce it.
USDA has failed to follow any of the administrative procedures required to create enforceable regulations when it issued this new step in NAIS. So whether USDA can actually enforce it isn’t clear. On the other hand, USDA has created the entire NAIS program without regard to following the rules administrative agencies must follow, soit’s likely that the state agencies will automatically follow the USDA’s memo. Here are some excerpts from
USDA has failed to follow any of the administrative procedures required to create enforceable regulations when it issued this new step in NAIS. So whether USDA can actually enforce it isn’t clear. On the other hand, USDA has created the entire NAIS program without regard to following the rules administrative agencies must follow, so it’s likely that the state agencies will automatically follow the USDA’s memo. Here are some excerpts from the memo:
- USDA is requiring NAIS premises registration “as the sole and
standard location identifier” for activities relating to any disease
regulated through the Code of Federal Regulations, for emerging or
re-emerging disease, and for foreign animal diseases (page 1, Section
II & III.A.1)
- People who refuse to voluntarily register their properties in
NAIS will be registered against their will: “If the person responsible
for the premises chooses not to complete the form to register his/her
premises, either the animal health official or an accredited
veterinarian will collect the defined data fields.” (page 2, Section
III.B.2)
- The memo applies to federal animal health authorities, state
animal health authorities, and private veterinarians who are
accredited for federally regulated diseases (page 1, Section I)
- Any veterinarian who is accredited for a federally regulated
disease is subject to the USDA’s edict to involuntarily register his
or her clients:
-USDA states that PIN’s are not required for “participation in voluntary programs,” but does not explain which those would be (p.6)
The full memo is posted at: http://www.libertyark.net/APHIS-PIN-Mandate-080922.pdf
“A PIN is required for activities performed at a premises by a State or Federal animal health authority or an accredited veterinarian for any disease that is regulated through Title 9 of the Code of Federal Regulations.” (page 4)
- The listed disease programs for which a PIN will be required
include:
- Tuberculosis
- Brucellosis
- Johne’s disease
- Pseudorabies
- Scrapie
- Chronic Wasting Disease
- Low pathogenic Avian Influenza of the H5/H7 strains
- Communicable diseases in horses, asses, ponies, mules, and
zebras, which would include equine Infectious Anemia
- Texas (splenetic) fever in cattle
- Scabies in cattle
- Exotic Newcastle disease and chlamydiosis
- Poultry health as addressed in the National Poultry
Improvement Plan
- Swine Health
- The activities that will result in being registered in NAIS include:
o Vaccinations
o Diagnostic tests
o Certifications (other than certificates of veterinary
inspection)
o Application of official eartags or backtags (page 5)
-USDA states that PIN’s are not required for “participation in voluntary programs,” but does not explain which those would be (p.6)
The full memo is posted at: http://www.libertyark.net/APHIS-PIN-Mandate-080922.pdf
