Anyone reading this blog should understand that Real ID is a single cog in a bigger machination.
In the past, we wondered why Presidential Candidates have not spoken more about the Real ID Act and its role to "round up" citizen's identities. Real ID's struggle for Executive representation as a populist issue started during the New Hampshire primaries.
UnionLeader.com reported the following in December of 2007:
"While former Sen. John Edwards and Ron Paul are on record against Real ID as a threat to civil liberties, as is Congressman Dennis Kucinich, Sen. Barack Obama's only response so far has been to object on grounds it's an unfunded mandate and not enough has been done to help the state's implement it.
Chris Calabrese said the ACLU projects that although Real ID calls for the states to be in charge of their own information, ultimately the Feds will say "let us handle the database".
"Ebel and Calabrese said the Department of Homeland Security is beginning to figure out there's growing opposition to Real ID at the state level, so they've introduced the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative that ACLU officials termed a "bait and switch" plan, which would hook up the driver's license base to customs databases.
Although people were originally going to have a passport to cross the border, DHS said if states linked their driver's license base to customs databases, they'd then be in compliance with Real ID.
A key concern is that the DHS could expand the uses beyond the official purpose of Real ID. As specified by legislation, the Real ID is a secure card issued by states to be used only for the following reasons: to access a federal facility, board federally regulated commercial aircraft and enter nuclear plants."
The Bigger Picture for Real ID
If the plan for Continuity of Government wasn't both pervasive and censored from the majority of our media, we could ignore it. However, Continuity of Government planning continues rain or shine.
Elections determine the current sucession of government. Unrest in Russian territories and "terrorists" touching nuclear weapons threats invoke Continuity of Government or COG. Impeachment proceedings, by all appearances, are being treated like a threat to succession of our current government.
Q: Why have you taken impeachment off the table as an option for President George W. Bush? Nancy Shipes WOODSTOWN, N.J.
A: I took it off the table a long time ago. You can't talk about impeachment unless you have the facts, and you can't have the facts unless you have cooperation from the Administration. I think the Republicans would like nothing better than for us to focus on impeachment and take our eye off the ball of a progressive economic agenda.
The Demand for Constitutional Accountability - Seeing Crimes CommittedIn Los Angeles, Peter Thottam, Green Party Candidate & Impeachment Activist was arrested last night for confronting Nancy Pelosi at a book signing. {Action which got Peter Thottam arrested below}
"Security Guard called the LAPD officers and made a citizen's arrest. Spent the night in jail. The police officers were sympathetic and agreed about the role of big money in Congress. They agreed that Pelosi and these reps are just tools, " Peter Thottam.
We Are Change doing a similar action here:
So what is going on that there is no prosecution of our President? BeatTheChip has a clue.
1 comment:
Jack Brooks and Henry B. Gonzales, both former Texas congressmen, in the late 80s and early 1990s exposed Rex 80 and Continuity of Government plans back then. Oliver North was one of the chief designers of the Rex 84 plan.(concentration camps for U.S. citizens).
Here is the famous video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug0IL7k3elQ
Post a Comment