Harman was recorded saying she would “waddle into” the AIPAC case “if you think it’ll make a difference,” according to two former senior national security officials familiar with the NSA transcript.In exchange for Harman’s help, the sources said, the suspected Israeli agent pledged to help lobby Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., then-House minority leader, to appoint Harman chair of the Intelligence Committee after the 2006 elections, which the Democrats were heavily favored to win.
Seemingly wary of what she had just agreed to, according to an official who read the NSA transcript, Harman hung up after saying, “This conversation doesn’t exist."
Oh, what? You didn't know that RAND Corporation has their favorite federal legislators? My god... Jane Harman is just 20 minutes or less from Rand Corp in Santa Monica, CA. And she delivers.
Yeah, we just love the disingenuous greasing from Blue Dog democrat, Jane Harman; author of the HR 1955 (May it R.I.P.) The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act 2007. It is now commonly & historically known as the Thought Crime Bill.
There is quite a buzz brimming right now about DHS's Radicalization Branch since cornball commoners got up out of their arm chairs and donned rediculous felt tri-cornered hats and bothered the feds about generations of the reckless fleecing. BTW... the FED CAN GET AUDITED JUST LIKE WE CAN.
Enough, liberty is not just for teabaggers, anymore. It's not just for people who listen to Brooks & Dunn and eat steak with their hot blonde wives. It's for broke, unemployed, dumped, semi-homeless people who have LOST THEIR LIVES over the way Wall Street and our government does business. What kind of world are we living in when we can't get a tax return when we need it and there's no unemployment money for us when we paid it forward when times were better?
I find it strange that the Homegrown Terrorism act never passes, but somehow is then budgeted and added as a DHS branch which produced a document criminalizing anyone gathering publicly to protest about immigration (for or against current trends) or abortion (for or against) or if you plan on drawing any kind of boundary based on the 10th amendment with the federal government.
I think that had a lot to do with Jane Harman.
No comments:
Post a Comment